סטיווען מיללער רופט צו פריזען אימיגראציע קיין אמעריקע
Stephen Miller reignited a major national debate after calling for a full moratorium on immigration from third-world countries, echoing the same policy vision President Trump has repeatedly championed. In a Fox News interview, Miller argued that the United States must “heal itself as a nation” before continuing the large-scale immigration flows that have reshaped the country’s demographics and placed unprecedented strain on social systems.
Miller pointed to a historical period often ignored in mainstream education and media. From roughly 1920 to 1970—following the passage of the 1924 Immigration Act—the United States experienced net negative migration. During those fifty years, America’s population still doubled, driven almost entirely by natural births. Miller described this era as the “cauldron in which a unified, shared national identity was formed,” emphasizing that strong family growth and cultural cohesion provided the foundation for a confident, stable, and prosperous America.
Supporters of Trump-era policies argue that today’s immigration levels bear no resemblance to those earlier decades. Record numbers of arrivals, overwhelmed border authorities, rising fiscal burdens, and intensified cultural fragmentation have left millions of Americans frustrated and concerned about the nation’s future. Miller contends that a strategic pause—focused specifically on migration from unstable or hostile regions—would give the U.S. time to restore order, rebuild infrastructure, stabilize wages, and reinforce national unity.
Critics have attempted to frame Miller’s remarks as extreme, but the underlying data he references is well-established: America’s strongest period of assimilation and middle-class expansion occurred during a time of historically low immigration. For many conservatives and Trump supporters, the lesson is clear—sovereignty, identity, and stability require firm, unapologetic policy decisions.
As the country looks toward a future defined by global competition and domestic challenges, Miller’s comments are likely to resonate across a growing segment of Americans who believe the nation must prioritize security, social cohesion, and national interest above all else. Whether opponents like it or not, the conversation about immigration pauses—and what the U.S. stands to gain from them—is back on the national stage, stronger than ever.
גאלערי
ווידעאס