Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), recently designated a terrorist organization by the European Union, conducted extensive military drills near the entrance to the Strait of Hormuz on February 16–17, 2026. The exercises involved cruise missile launches from mobile truck-mounted and boat platforms, with regime media footage showing a commercial tanker in the vicinity, underscoring the strategic significance of the waterway through which roughly 20 percent of global oil supplies transit.

The “Smart Control of Hormuz Strait” drills are part of Iran’s ongoing effort to project power and signal operational readiness in a region critical to international energy security. The exercises simulate rapid-response tactics designed to challenge adversary vessels and demonstrate Tehran’s capacity to influence maritime traffic under high-tension scenarios.

The timing of the drills follows the EU’s January 29, 2026, designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization, adding diplomatic pressure and raising the stakes for Western and regional observers. Analysts note that such provocative maneuvers could justify potential countermeasures from international actors while reinforcing Iran’s leverage in the lead-up to renewed U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations.

Officials highlight that the drills emphasize asymmetric warfare doctrine, employing mobile launch platforms to complicate targeting and enhance survivability. By combining coastal, riverine, and maritime operations, the IRGC seeks to establish multiple layers of defense capable of disrupting shipping and deterring perceived threats to Iranian interests.

The exercises also send a clear message to the United States and its allies that any military or diplomatic initiatives in the region must account for Tehran’s demonstrated operational capabilities. Observers view the drills as both a tactical demonstration and a strategic communication tool, signaling that Iran remains prepared to assert control over one of the world’s most critical oil chokepoints.

These developments occur as indirect nuclear talks between the U.S. and Iran continue, highlighting the interplay between military signaling and diplomacy in shaping the negotiating environment. The IRGC’s actions underscore the regime’s approach of coupling dialogue with displays of strength to maximize leverage in international discussions.