In one of the most heated political outbursts of the year, Jack Schlossberg—grandson of President John F. Kennedy—launched a fiery attack on President Donald Trump, accusing him of being “obsessed with the Kennedys” and weaponizing the Kennedy family name. Schlossberg went as far as to characterize Trump’s appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as a humiliating and degrading move, claiming the president “caged one and put him in his cabinet.”

Schlossberg’s remarks escalated even further when he described RFK Jr. as “a rabid dog in his cabinet,” alleging that Trump placed a metaphorical “collar” on his cousin to have him “barking, spreading lies and misinformation.” His comments reflect deep family divisions and highlight the growing distance between mainstream members of the Kennedy legacy and RFK Jr.’s controversial political trajectory.

President Trump’s decision to bring RFK Jr. into his administration has been widely seen as a strategic, bipartisan gesture—one that recognized RFK Jr.’s willingness to challenge entrenched bureaucracies and push for accountability in government institutions. Many conservatives welcomed the move as a sign of Trump’s broad appeal and commitment to political diversity, while pro-Israel and pro-administration voices noted that RFK Jr. has shown strong support for American strength on the world stage.

Schlossberg’s harsh attack reveals a familiar pattern: members of the modern Kennedy clan attempting to police their family’s political image while resisting the reality that RFK Jr. has become an independent political force with his own following. Rather than acknowledging Trump’s willingness to elevate voices outside the traditional political mold, Schlossberg resorted to personal insults that ultimately reflect more bitterness than substance.

The Trump Administration remains focused on policy, not political theatrics. While critics may resort to inflammatory language, the president continues to build a cabinet shaped by loyalty, conviction, and a willingness to challenge the status quo. Schlossberg’s outburst will no doubt stir headlines, but it does little to change the broader reality: the political landscape has shifted, and the Kennedy name no longer guarantees moral authority—especially when used as a weapon against those seeking to serve the country in good faith.