As criticism mounts from major media outlets over President Trump’s $250 million privately funded White House ballroom expansion, many ordinary Americans are voicing support — praising the project as both necessary and patriotic.

The plan, which Trump described as “the finest ballroom ever built,” aims to modernize the historic executive mansion without using taxpayer money. According to Trump, the expansion is being financed entirely through private donations, a move his supporters argue underscores his commitment to fiscal responsibility and national pride.

“He’s spending his money and not my taxpayer money. It’s ok with me — and as with any old house, things need to be renovated,” one supporter said.

Others drew comparisons to President Harry Truman’s 1949 renovation, when the White House was gutted and rebuilt from within to address severe structural decay — a project that cost $5.4 million at the time (roughly $70 million today).

“Truman did a total remodel, gutted the White House… because it needed done,” another American remarked.

Critics in the media have accused the Trump administration of indulging in architectural excess, but public sentiment online tells a different story. Many argue that the White House, now more than two centuries old, should reflect both historic preservation and modern functionality, especially for major state events and diplomatic gatherings.

“I really don’t see any major issue with it,” said one respondent. “The White House has been changed several times in the past.”

The ballroom expansion, according to internal planning documents, is expected to serve as a multi-purpose venue for state dinners, ceremonies, and cultural events, with design elements inspired by classical American architecture.

For supporters, Trump’s initiative represents not vanity — but stewardship: a private investment in preserving America’s most iconic residence for future generations.