Media personality Tucker Carlson ignited controversy following a February 21, 2026, interview with U.S. Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee, during which he claimed he had shared his flight details with the Israel Defense Forces to avoid being mistakenly targeted and described Israel as “probably the most violent country in the world.” The remarks quickly drew widespread criticism online, with hundreds of responses—many defending Israel and challenging Carlson’s characterization.

Carlson’s comments appeared to focus on Israel’s ongoing regional security conflicts rather than internal crime or societal violence. However, comparative global data paints a markedly different picture. The 2025 Global Peace Index ranks Israel 144th out of 163 countries in overall peacefulness, placing it far above active war zones such as Ukraine and Syria, which occupy the lowest positions on the list. Analysts note that Israel’s ranking reflects the persistent external threats it faces rather than levels of domestic violence comparable to failed or conflict-ridden states.

Supporters of Israel argue that Carlson’s framing overlooks the context of constant security challenges, including rocket attacks, terrorism, and hostile actors on multiple borders. They emphasize that Israel’s military operations are defensive responses to these threats and that the country maintains robust democratic institutions, rule of law, and internal stability despite operating in one of the world’s most volatile regions.

The backlash to Carlson’s remarks underscores the sensitivity surrounding discussions of Israel’s security posture and the importance of distinguishing between external conflict dynamics and internal societal conditions. As debates continue, the episode highlights the broader struggle over how Israel’s actions and security environment are portrayed in international media and public discourse.