President Donald J. Trump arrived in Washington, D.C., for what he declared a “historic” and “long-awaited” moment of peace between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, marking the inaugural diplomatic event at the newly unveiled Donald J. Trump Institute of Peace. Addressing global delegates, Trump emphasized the gravity of the ceremony, calling it a “special occasion” not only for its symbolism but for its potential to end one of the most devastating conflicts of the modern era.

For more than 30 years, Eastern Congo has suffered a relentless cycle of violence, tribal clashes, rebel insurgencies, and foreign-backed militias. The toll has been catastrophic—millions killed, communities uprooted, and generations deprived of stability. Trump underscored that numerous previous administrations attempted to intervene but failed to produce lasting results. “Many administrations have tried,” he said. “Today, we’re succeeding where so many others have failed.”

The “Washington Accords,” brokered under the Trump Administration, commit Rwanda and the DRC to halt all forms of proxy warfare. Rwanda agreed to end all support for the M23 rebels, while the Democratic Republic of Congo pledged to dismantle and neutralize Hutu extremist militias operating along the border. Trump framed the agreement as a major geopolitical achievement driven by American leadership, diplomatic pressure, and a renewed commitment to global stability.

The President praised both nations for what he described as “courageous and honorable” steps toward peace. “Today, we commit to stopping decades of violence and bloodshed,” he told attendees. “This is the beginning of a new era of harmony and cooperation between the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda.”

However, early reports indicate that fighting in Eastern Congo resumed only hours after the signing, highlighting the fragility of the agreement. Long-standing disputes over mineral-rich territories—particularly cobalt and coltan reserves essential for global technology markets—remain unresolved. Analysts warn that without strict enforcement, third-party verification, and sustained international pressure, rebel groups and militia factions may continue to threaten stability.

Despite these challenges, Trump hailed the ceremony as a major diplomatic victory. Supporters argue that the agreement demonstrates the administration’s capacity to deliver results where global institutions and previous leadership failed. In pro-Israel and pro-peace circles, the signing is being compared to earlier Trump-led breakthroughs in the Middle East, including the Abraham Accords—further cementing his legacy as a president who prioritizes peace through strength.

While the situation on the ground remains tense, the Washington Accords represent the strongest attempt in decades to halt a conflict that has devastated Central Africa. Whether the peace holds or falters will depend on the willingness of both governments to resist the pull of old grievances and fully honor the commitments made under U.S. leadership. For now, the Trump Administration is framing the accord as a key foreign-policy success and a reminder that decisive American engagement can shift the course of history.