FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed that the bureau is investigating encrypted Signal group chats that an independent journalist says were used to coordinate anti‑ICE activist activity in Minneapolis during heightened immigration enforcement operations. Patel’s remarks, made during a public statement to the media, emphasize that the FBI is examining whether the communications crossed legal boundaries and potentially endangered federal law enforcement officers.

According to the reports, conservative journalist Cam Higby claimed to have infiltrated several Signal groups where activists shared information about U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol vehicle movements, compiled license plate numbers, and coordinated responses. Some members reportedly organized “shifts” to track agents and react to their locations in real time.

Patel told reporters that the FBI’s focus is on determining whether the encrypted chats included activity that would violate federal law, such as doxxing officers, obstructing law enforcement, or creating unsafe situations for agents carrying out their duties. He stressed that peaceful protest and lawful communication remain protected, but that coordinated efforts that illegally impede federal officers or put them at risk could prompt enforcement actions.

The announcement comes amid intense tensions in Minneapolis following deadly confrontations between federal immigration agents and local activists. Minneapolis and the surrounding area have seen widespread unrest related to “Operation Metro Surge,” a Trump administration immigration enforcement initiative, including the fatal shooting of 37‑year‑old Alex Pretti by U.S. Border Patrol agents, which has heightened public debate and scrutiny of federal tactics.

Civil liberties advocates caution that broad investigations into encrypted communication platforms can raise complex constitutional questions about free speech and privacy. Legal experts note that while encryption and organization of protests are legal, coordination that crosses into obstruction, threats, or incitement could be subject to criminal inquiry.

The FBI’s confirmation that it is probing Signal chat groups underscores the delicate balance between protecting law enforcement personnel and preserving First Amendment rights, even as local communities grapple with the aftermath of heated clashes over immigration policy and enforcement in Minnesota.