Senator Markwayne Mullin sharply criticized Democrats over a partial Department of Homeland Security shutdown during a televised interview, calling the move “political theater” designed to score points rather than address substantive policy. Mullin’s remarks, highlighted in a video shared by conservative journalist Eric Daugherty, focused on the disruption caused to federal employees while noting that Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations remain fully funded through 2028 despite furloughs affecting approximately 90% of DHS staff.

The shutdown, which took effect February 15, 2026, followed unsuccessful negotiations regarding oversight of ICE activities during President Donald Trump’s second-term immigration enforcement agenda. Democrats reportedly blocked a clean continuing resolution in protest of policies they consider overly aggressive, particularly mass deportation initiatives, triggering a temporary lapse in funding for most DHS divisions.

Mullin characterized the closure as an avoidable interference with federal operations, arguing that it jeopardizes thousands of government workers while failing to impact ongoing enforcement priorities. According to the senator, the shutdown is largely symbolic, serving as a political statement rather than a functional necessity, and illustrates partisan tensions surrounding immigration policy.

The partial shutdown has generated concern about operational continuity across non-ICE DHS programs, including border security, cybersecurity, and disaster response, where furloughs could delay services or complicate coordination. Lawmakers on both sides have acknowledged the potential effects, though debate remains focused on the larger ideological and procedural disputes driving the impasse.

Mullin’s public condemnation aligns with broader Republican criticism that Democrats are leveraging federal shutdowns to disrupt enforcement while maintaining the president’s priority programs. Observers note that while ICE continues core operations, the widespread furloughs present administrative and morale challenges for DHS employees, who are caught between political contention and operational demands.

As negotiations continue, the partial shutdown highlights the persistent divide over immigration strategy, federal oversight, and the use of appropriations as a tool in political debates. Mullin’s statement frames the situation as a cautionary example of governance being affected by partisan posturing rather than policy necessity.