UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has declared that Britain will formally recognise a Palestinian state as early as September unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire and commits to a two-state solution. The announcement, framed as a response to what he called an "increasingly intolerable" situation in Gaza, has drawn criticism from pro-Israel voices who argue it rewards terrorism and undermines long-standing diplomatic norms.

Starmer’s position places pressure squarely on Israel at a time when the nation is grappling with the continued threat of rocket attacks and terrorism from groups like Hamas, which have embedded themselves within civilian infrastructure in Gaza. Critics say preemptively recognising a Palestinian state without concrete steps toward peace or demilitarisation not only legitimises extremist factions but also threatens to derail genuine peace efforts.

Israel has long maintained that any recognition of Palestinian statehood must come through direct negotiations that ensure Israel's security and the demilitarisation of hostile actors. Starmer’s ultimatum, viewed by many as one-sided, may embolden extremist elements while sidelining diplomatic progress.

While the Labour government sees the move as symbolic and humanitarian, critics argue it places unrealistic and dangerous pressure on Israel to make unilateral concessions, with little assurance of reciprocity or peace in return.