Television host Tucker Carlson recently sparked controversy by claiming that fears of radical Islam in the United States are part of a psychological operation promoted by the Israeli government. Carlson stated, “It comes from the Israeli government,” suggesting that public perception of Islamist terrorism is manipulated to influence American opinion.

During his remarks, Carlson also asserted that he is unaware of a single American who has been killed by radical Islamic attacks over the past 24 years. He contrasted these perceived threats with domestic dangers, including drugs and pornography, which he argued pose more tangible risks to American society.

However, official data contradicts Carlson’s claims. According to the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), approximately 100 Americans have been killed in jihadist terrorist attacks since 2001. Notable incidents include the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting in Orlando, Florida, which left 49 dead; the 2015 San Bernardino attack, which killed 14; the 2009 Fort Hood shooting, claiming 13 lives; and a 2025 New Orleans truck ramming attack, which resulted in 14 deaths.

Carlson’s comments have reignited debate over the perception of terrorism threats in the U.S., the role of media in shaping public opinion, and the accuracy of claims regarding national security risks. Analysts note that while domestic concerns are real, dismissing the verified impact of jihadist attacks can lead to misinformation and underestimation of ongoing counterterrorism challenges.