Donald Trump stated in a radio interview that he would “absolutely prohibit the Sharia Law thing” in the United States. Speaking by phone with Glenn Beck on August 26, 2026, Trump said the practice is occurring “a little bit” in the country and that “where we see it, we take it out.” He underscored the principle that the United States has only one legal system. The remarks formed part of a wider conversation that also touched on affordability and foreign policy. Trump presented the position as a matter of basic national coherence.

Trump framed the issue around the need for a single, uniform system of law. He argued that allowing any parallel legal framework would undermine the established American order. By stating that observed instances must be removed, he left little ambiguity about enforcement. The former president tied the stance to common sense and the supremacy of American law. He presented the prohibition as a straightforward defense of existing legal structures rather than a new or experimental policy.

During the same interview Trump pointed to conditions he said already exist in cities such as London and Paris. He used those references to illustrate what can occur when separate legal practices gain a foothold. The comparison served to reinforce his call for preventive action inside the United States. Trump’s language remained direct, repeating that the response should be to take the practice out wherever it appears. The discussion kept the focus on maintaining one system rather than accommodating multiple codes.

The interview format allowed Trump to address the topic in a conversational yet firm manner. Beck’s program provided the platform for the comments, which were delivered by phone. Trump did not elaborate on specific legislative mechanisms in the available remarks, concentrating instead on the clear outcome he favors. The emphasis remained on prohibition and removal as the appropriate responses. Listeners heard a consistent message that American law alone should govern.

Trump’s statements align with a broader theme of institutional clarity that he has raised in other settings. In this instance he applied that theme to the question of Sharia practices. By asserting that even limited occurrences should be eliminated, he set a zero-tolerance threshold. The reference to a single system served as both justification and goal. The August 26 conversation placed the issue alongside other domestic and international subjects without diluting the directness of the legal point.

The remarks leave a clear public record of Trump’s position. He would prohibit Sharia law, treat any presence of it as unacceptable, and act to remove it in order to preserve one national legal framework. The citation of European cities supplied an external point of comparison. Combined with the insistence on common sense and American legal supremacy, the interview statements form a coherent and forcefully expressed view. Further details on implementation were not provided in the discussion.